AI Visibility Audit
This report is confidential. Enter the access code provided by Saigon Digital to continue.
Incorrect code. Please try again.
Prepared by saigon.digital · April 2026
This report is confidential. Enter the access code provided by Saigon Digital to continue.
Your customers are no longer just searching on Google — they're asking AI which companies to shortlist. This audit shows exactly where you stand, who's winning, and what to do next.
Saigon Digital has been a valuable partner in strengthening our digital presence and thinking more strategically about visibility in modern search. Their team understands not just websites and SEO, but where search is heading — especially with AI-driven discovery changing how families research schools. They brought practical recommendations and a strong commercial mindset around admissions ROI, school visits, and enquiry generation. We were impressed by their ability to connect technical execution with real outcomes for brand awareness and parent engagement.
See how we've helped brands grow. Read our case studies and learn more about what we do.
View Case StudiesA snapshot of where Consolidocs stands in the AI search era — and the opportunity cost of the current gap.
Consolidocs has a genuinely differentiated positioning — post-signature contract management built around visibility and accountability. But when buyers ask AI tools which CLM platform to use for obligation tracking, compliance, or contract performance, it's Juro, Ironclad, Concord, and DocuSign CLM that own the conversation. With a DR of just 3 and only 1 organic keyword, Consolidocs is completely invisible to the AI engines shaping B2B shortlists — and the gap is compounding every month as competitors publish content that trains the next generation of models.
We tested how Consolidocs appears when potential customers ask AI tools to recommend post-signature contract management solutions. Here's what we found.
ChatGPT defaults to Juro, Ironclad, Concord, and DocuSign CLM for all contract management queries. Consolidocs is not in its recommendation set.
AI Overviews for CLM and post-signature queries surface Juro, Gatekeeper, CobbleStone, and Ironclad. Consolidocs does not appear in any tested results.
Perplexity draws from high-DR content hubs and review platforms. With DR 3 and no third-party mentions, Consolidocs has no pathway into these results.
Gemini cites the same high-authority CLM brands — Juro, Sirion, DocuSign — with no signal from Consolidocs in any post-signature or obligation tracking query.
0 / 4 platforms currently surface Consolidocs in relevant AI-generated recommendations.
Structured authority content, third-party mentions on G2 and Capterra, FAQ pages, comparison hubs, and consistent brand signals across the legal tech web — all of which competitors currently dominate.
We ran the exact searches your buyers use when asking AI tools to recommend a solution. Here's who appeared — and whether Consolidocs was in the answer.
Consolidocs does not appear in any of the four tested buyer queries — not even for the post-signature niche it specifically owns. The category conversation is entirely controlled by competitors with 20–70× higher domain authority and deep content libraries that AI tools train on and cite.
Post-signature contract management is a narrow, underserved niche. No single competitor truly "owns" it yet. Consolidocs could become the definitive voice for this category with targeted content and authority-building — a realistic goal within 90–120 days.
These are the companies currently winning AI recommendations in your market. Understanding why they're cited — and you're not — reveals the exact gap to close.
| Company | DR | ChatGPT | Google AIO | Perplexity | Why They Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidocs You | 3 | Not Cited | Not Appearing | Not Cited | Audit target |
| Juro | 72 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | Massive content engine with buyer's guides, comparison pages, and deep post-signature content. DR 72 makes it AI's default CLM recommendation. |
| ContractSafe | 66 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | Owns the "best contract management software" buyer guide (16 tools compared) that AI engines quote directly. Strong G2 and Capterra presence. |
| Concord | 64 | Cited | Appearing | Partial | Clear "post-signature tracking" positioning with published pricing. Frequently cited in AI "best CLM for small business" answers. |
| Sirion | 63 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | AI-native enterprise CLM with strong post-execution governance messaging. Gartner-mentioned and heavy industry publication coverage. |
| Ironclad | 42 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | Workflow-driven CLM with Salesforce integration. Strong brand recognition from L'Oréal and Mastercard case studies that AI tools reference. |
Badge key: Cited Partial Not Cited
These are the highest-leverage changes Consolidocs can make right now to start appearing in AI-generated recommendations within 60–120 days.
Publish a definitive "Best Post-Signature Contract Management Software 2026" guide with structured FAQ schema. No competitor currently owns this exact niche phrase — it's an open lane. Include comparisons vs Juro, Concord, Ironclad, and Gatekeeper to capture "vs" queries AI tools love to cite.
Launch a blog with 8–12 high-intent articles targeting queries like "contract obligation tracking software", "how to manage contracts after signing", and "CLM for accountability". Each piece should include structured data, FAQ schema, and clear brand positioning to feed AI training data.
Claim profiles on G2, Capterra, Software Advice, and GetApp. Secure listings on LegalTech directories and LawNext. These are the exact sources AI platforms scan to build "best CLM software" recommendation lists — without them, you're invisible to every model.
This audit shows the problem. We have a clear strategy to fix it — and results typically show within the first 60 days of engagement.
Consolidocs has a clear positioning advantage — post-signature contract management is a niche no competitor fully owns yet. The authority gap is real, but it's closeable. We've done this for SaaS and B2B brands across the UK and globally. A 30-minute call is all it takes to map out a plan.
Nick Rowe · CEO & Co-Founder, Saigon Digital
Full GEO strategy, content plan, authority-building roadmap, and monthly performance reporting — all focused on AI search visibility.
Most clients start seeing AI citation improvements within 45–60 days. Full competitive parity typically achieved in 90–120 days.
Every month your competitors build more authority signals, the gap widens. AI models are training on content published now — delay compounds the problem.